1963 and 1964 Ford Galaxie 500 WIPs; 63 Finished – Outdoor Pics

Here's where I started working on reviving an old 63 build and adding a 64 build.

I took the 63 apart with only minor issues and the 63 frame fits perfectly on the 64 body. I would like to have and engine in both. So here's the plan:

  1. Cut out the hood carefully on the 64. Since it has 4 posts (2 for mounting the interior and 2 for the frame) and mounts for the grill/bumper assembly. It is also very thin without underside detail so I am going to discard it.
  2. Remove the paint from the disassembled 63 and sand out the center dart in the hood to use it on the 64 since it it the same size. Add tabs to the underside of the front fenders on the 64 for hood supports.
  3. Cut out the radiator support and radiator on the disassembled 63 to use in the 64. It will locate on the frame from the new 63 kit.
  4. Paint the bodies and interiors from both the new 63 and 64 kits.
  5. Paint the frame, engine and assemble the engine from the new 63 kit to use in the 64.
  6. Use the already painted and assembled frame and engine for the new 63 body and interior.

In this manner, I can build two complete models with engines (I think) with better paint and fresh foil, hopefully!

The stance will be corrected by gluing the wheel stems to the frame in the back and getting rid of the metal axle.

I did a lot of detail in the engine department years ago; the engine has plug wires, gas line, alternator lines, battery cables and even a dip stick! And look at that firewall – I must have been a wild man back then!

Here's the underside of the hood on the 64:

 

Source: http://cs.scaleautomag.com/SCACS/forums/thread/1012281.aspx

Kenny Acheson Andrea de Adamich Philippe Adams Walt Ader Kurt Adolff Fred Agabashian

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

The right race in the wrong place?

Sebastian Vettel gave this already fascinating Formula 1 world championship another huge twist at the Bahrain Grand Prix with his first victory of the season.

What looked for a while like it might turn into a carbon-copy of so many of the Red Bull driver’s wins on his way to the title last year – pole, blitz the start, consolidate lead – turned into a fascinating battle with the Lotus of Kimi Raikkonen.

The Finn showed all his old skill and consistency as he climbed from 11th place on the grid to take second place. In so doing, Raikkonen finally delivered on the potential of a car that has looked capable of this sort of result since the start of the season and proved he has lost nothing in his two years away in rallying.

The result, and a nightmare race for McLaren, leaves the championship finely poised going into a three-week break before the Spanish Grand Prix, with Vettel leapfrogging from fifth overall to first and only a handful of points covering all the top five.

In order to see this content you need to have both Javascript enabled and Flash installed. Visit BBC Webwise for full instructions. If you’re reading via RSS, you’ll need to visit the blog to access this content.


All of this, though, has been completely overshadowed by the situation outside the track, and the controversy over F1′s decision to return to Bahrain despite ongoing civil unrest in the Gulf state.

The race has dominated the news agenda over the weekend and, for those involved in the sport, it has not been pretty.

Most people could see the situation F1 has found itself in this weekend coming from miles away, but if the sport’s bosses did, they are doing a good job of hiding it.

Last year’s Bahrain Grand Prix was cancelled following the violent suppression of protests which were part of the Arab Spring that swept across much of the Middle East.

Troubles have continued, despite promises by the ruling royal family to instigate reform following a critical independent report last November, which detailed human rights abuses, including wrongful arrests and torture. Amnesty International says the situation in Bahrain is “not much different” from a year ago.

Yet F1 chose to return, FIA president Jean Todt and commercial boss Bernie Ecclestone believing the claims of the authorities that the situation was much improved and that they could guarantee security.

It did not take long for that last claim to be exposed. Returning from the track on Wednesday evening, down the main highway into the capital Manama, four Force India mechanics were caught between protestors on one side of the road and riot police on the other.

The protestors were throwing petrol bombs at the police, who were responding with tear gas. Petrol bombs flew over the car, and one landed worryingly close.

The whole incident lasted no more than two or three minutes, but it clearly spooked those involved – and the rest of their team, who subsequently chose to skip second practice on Friday so they could return to their hotels before dark. A decision made despite an intervention by Ecclestone.

Most F1 personnel encountered no trouble. But the unrest continued throughout the weekend, and on Friday night a protestor was killed.

Vettel, who had described the controversy over the race as “hype” when he arrived on Thursday, was forced to think again. “It’s always dreadful when someone dies,” he said after qualifying on pole position.

For all the protestations from Todt and Ecclestone about sport staying apart from politics, the grand prix has become part of the argument in Bahrain.

The protests are not specifically directed at the race, but it is seen as a legitimate target because it is so closely identified with the ruling Sunni royal family, who set it up as a global promotional tool for the country and by extension their regime.

The race organisers – effectively the royal family themselves – have overtly politicised the event by promoting it with posters using the F1 logo in the middle of the slogan “UniF1ed”, in a country that is clearly anything but.

Protesters in Bahrain

Protests have targeted Formula 1 both inside Bahrain and across the world. Photo: Getty

Ecclestone’s and Todt’s responses to this – that they cannot control how people promote their races (Ecclestone) or that the slogan can be interpreted in lots of ways (Todt) – are debatable at best. Some have called it sophistry.

If F1′s bosses thought they could go to Bahrain, pick up the huge pay cheque for the race, and get out without any damage to their or the sport’s reputation, they have been disabused of that notion in the starkest terms.

On Saturday, Mercedes team boss Ross Brawn – who, behind the scenes, has been one of the senior figures most opposed to holding the Bahrain race – said F1 “with proper judgement of what happened and what we saw needed to come to a conclusion”.

I am told by senior insiders that the many of the sport’s bosses have been staggered by the extent to which the sport’s name has been dragged through the mud this weekend, as well as the focus on it by major global news organisations.

Quite apart from the obvious moral and personal safety issues involved, this is clearly a commercial concern. F1 is selling a dream and an aspiration. But the dream has this weekend become a nightmare – and there has been nothing aspirational about the image the sport has presented to the world.

F1 being what it is, if anything will make them wake up to the potential consequences of racing in Bahrain, that will be it.

Source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/andrewbenson/2012/04/the_right_race_in_the_wrong_pl.html

Fernando Alonso Giovanna Amati George Amick Red Amick Chris Amon Bob Anderson

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

Rossi running Friday practice for Caterham

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/nofenders/zbjv/~3/eZ2JNSOHhUc/rossi-running-friday-practice-for.html

Trevor Blokdyk Mark Blundell Raul Boesel Menato Boffa Bob Bondurant Felice Bonetto

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

rat packer nova…DONE

not a chevy fan, but i love awb cars and gassers…just thought this car looked cool. not the best kit but with a little effort hopefully i can make it look good. didnt like the injectors so i made new ones and also ran piece of wire through for the linkage. front shocks didnt fit so i made new ones. here is my progress so far.
[View:http://cs.scaleautomag.com/SCACS/themes/sca/utility/:550:0]

Source: http://cs.scaleautomag.com/SCACS/forums/thread/1009095.aspx

Vittorio Brambilla Toni Branca Gianfranco Brancatelli Eric Brandon Don Branson Tom Bridger

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

Vettel sprouts a second finger

Source: http://www.metrof1.com/blogs/metrof1/2011/10/vettel-sprouts-a-second-finger.html

Elie Bayol Don Beauman Karl Gunther Bechem Jean Behra Derek Bell Stefan Bellof

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

McLaren not well-suited to Monaco, says Button | 2012 Monaco Grand Prix

McLaren not well-suited to Monaco, says Button is an original article from F1 Fanatic. If this article has been published anywhere other than F1 Fanatic it is an infringement of copyright.

Jenson Button says the MP4-27 isn’t the ideal car for the tight, slow Monte-Carlo track.

McLaren not well-suited to Monaco, says Button is an original article from F1 Fanatic. If this article has been published anywhere other than F1 Fanatic it is an infringement of copyright.

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/f1fanatic/~3/joFdTfy3rG8/

Sebastien Buemi Luiz Bueno Ian Burgess Luciano Burti Roberto Bussinello Jenson Button

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

Rosberg answers critics in emphatic style

Nico Rosberg looks every inch the archetypal image of a grand prix driver – blonde, good looking, perfect smile, the lot. And in Shanghai on Sunday, at the 111th attempt, he finally delivered the most important part of the package – the perfect win.

It has been a long time coming.

This is the 26-year-old German’s seventh season of F1 and while Lewis Hamilton, who was his team-mate when they were teenage karters 12 years ago, was a winner almost from the start of his Formula 1 career, Rosberg’s route to the top step of the podium has been somewhat more torturous.

So torturous, in fact, that there have been times when some wondered whether he would ever follow his father Keke in becoming a race winner.

Nico Rosberg’s dominant victory in China ensured he has become the first son of a living grand prix winner to follow in his father’s footsteps – and only the third ever. The fathers of Damon Hill and Jacques Villeneuve were killed when their son were children.

Keke Rosberg also had to wait a long time to stand on the top step of the podium – his first victory came in his fifth season.

Like Nico, that was Keke’s first year in a competitive car, and he ended it as world champion. It seems unlikely at this stage that Nico will follow his father in that sense, too, but after such a dominant win it certainly cannot be completely ruled out.

Nico Rosberg led from pole position to score Mercedes’ first victory since the 1955 Italian Grand Prix. Photo: Getty

Watching Rosberg’s assured driving as he drove away from team-mate Michael Schumacher in the early laps, and then proceeded to control the race, it seems strange to think that there have long been questions about his ultimate standing as a true world-class grand prix driver. But there have, and to some extent they remain still.

There is no doubt about the calibre of Rosberg’s win on Sunday, but it remains difficult to be absolutely sure of his ultimate potential.

He is clearly very fast – but just how fast is not completely clear. Likewise, it remains to be seen whether he possesses all the other qualities that make up a great grand prix driver.

So far, for example, he has appeared to be the sort of driver who will deliver to the potential of his car – but not one who is able to transcend it occasionally, in the manner of Hamilton or Fernando Alonso.

In his debut year, he was generally marginally out-paced by Mark Webber, his team-mate at Williams at the time. And for the rest of Rosberg’s career there before joining Mercedes in 2010 he was partnered with journeymen drivers and in uncompetitive cars.

Rosberg has dominated his Mercedes team-mate Michael Schumacher in qualifying since then, but it is clear to most that the seven-time champion is not the same driver he was before he retired in 2006 and spent three years on the sidelines. And until Sunday, Schumacher had generally matched Rosberg for race pace since last season.

The improved performance of Mercedes this year will finally give Rosberg the chance to go wheel-to-wheel with the top drivers on a consistent basis for the first time, so a clearer picture may well emerge.

A first win, especially one so impressive, will do wonders for his confidence, although he has never lacked for that.

Rosberg is a highly intelligent man, who was planning on a degree in engineering had he not become a Formula 1 driver. He is an individual character, and can be a prickly interviewee.

It may be that will change now he will no longer be faced with endless questions about whether he believes he can be a winner.

He could not have answered them in more emphatic style.

If Schumacher had thought Rosberg’s 0.5 seconds a lap advantage in qualifying was a one-off based on a unique set of circumstances, he was soon disabused of that belief in the race as the younger German sprinted off into the distance, building a five-second lead in the first 10 laps.

That margin was the foundation for his win, but it was not as if Rosberg then spent the rest of the afternoon hanging on in front of faster cars.

After the first pit stops, Jenson Button was up into a de facto second place and in clear air, but Rosberg continued to pull away, although he was on the faster tyre. Button came back at him before the McLaren driver made his second stop, but only marginally.

Had the mechanic fitting Button’s left rear tyre not suffered a problem with a cross-threaded wheel nut at his final stop, the Englishman would have rejoined about 14 seconds behind Rosberg with 19 laps to go.

Button’s pace on the slower tyre suggests that he would have closed on Rosberg at that stage, but whether it would have been quickly enough is a moot point.

McLaren team principal Martin Whitmarsh admitted: “I think it would have been very difficult to beat him.”

Where have a team who have gone backwards in the first two races found that pace from? Both Rosberg and Mercedes sports boss Norbert Haug had a simple explanation – set-up changes allowing better use of the tyres.

They had used them too much in the first race in Australia and not worked them enough in the second in Malaysia. Here in Shanghai they found a middle way.

Behind Rosberg was a fantastic scrap for second place, what Haug described as “one of the best races I have ever seen”.

Recounting the story of Red Bull’s race from ninth and 14th places on the first lap to fourth and fifth at the flag, team boss Christian Horner said he sounded “like a horse racing commentator”.

The championship is clearly going to be very close and it is setting up what look set to be a superb season.

“We’ve had three very different races,” Whitmarsh said, “and I think this is going to be a season where potentially we have 20 very different races.

“It’s fascinating, really. I enjoy it and I’m sure people watching it enjoy it. Who’s going to predict who’s going to win in Bahrain?”

Source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/andrewbenson/2012/04/rosberg_answers_critics_in_emp.html

Philippe Alliot Cliff Allison Fernando Alonso Giovanna Amati George Amick Red Amick

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

The Last Crusade

Source: http://www.metrof1.com/blogs/metrof1/2011/11/the-last-crusade.html

Pedro Matos Chaves Bill Cheesbourg Eddie Cheever Andrea Chiesa Ettore Chimeri Louis Chiron

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

Q2: F1 Pastor-ized

Pastor Maldonado led the way in the Q2 session in Barcelona, beating Lewis Hamilton, Romain Grosjean, Sergio Perez, Kimi Raikkonen, Fernando Alonso, Nico Rosberg, Sebastian Vettel, Kamui Kobayashi and Michael Schumacher. There was a surprise to see Jenson Button and Mark Webber being knocked out, along with the two Force Indias, the two Toro Rossos [...]

Source: http://joesaward.wordpress.com/2012/05/12/q2-f1-pastor-ized/

Tom Belso JeanPierre Beltoise Olivier Beretta Allen Berg Georges Berger Gerhard Berger

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

The right race in the wrong place?

Sebastian Vettel gave this already fascinating Formula 1 world championship another huge twist at the Bahrain Grand Prix with his first victory of the season.

What looked for a while like it might turn into a carbon-copy of so many of the Red Bull driver’s wins on his way to the title last year – pole, blitz the start, consolidate lead – turned into a fascinating battle with the Lotus of Kimi Raikkonen.

The Finn showed all his old skill and consistency as he climbed from 11th place on the grid to take second place. In so doing, Raikkonen finally delivered on the potential of a car that has looked capable of this sort of result since the start of the season and proved he has lost nothing in his two years away in rallying.

The result, and a nightmare race for McLaren, leaves the championship finely poised going into a three-week break before the Spanish Grand Prix, with Vettel leapfrogging from fifth overall to first and only a handful of points covering all the top five.

In order to see this content you need to have both Javascript enabled and Flash installed. Visit BBC Webwise for full instructions. If you’re reading via RSS, you’ll need to visit the blog to access this content.


All of this, though, has been completely overshadowed by the situation outside the track, and the controversy over F1′s decision to return to Bahrain despite ongoing civil unrest in the Gulf state.

The race has dominated the news agenda over the weekend and, for those involved in the sport, it has not been pretty.

Most people could see the situation F1 has found itself in this weekend coming from miles away, but if the sport’s bosses did, they are doing a good job of hiding it.

Last year’s Bahrain Grand Prix was cancelled following the violent suppression of protests which were part of the Arab Spring that swept across much of the Middle East.

Troubles have continued, despite promises by the ruling royal family to instigate reform following a critical independent report last November, which detailed human rights abuses, including wrongful arrests and torture. Amnesty International says the situation in Bahrain is “not much different” from a year ago.

Yet F1 chose to return, FIA president Jean Todt and commercial boss Bernie Ecclestone believing the claims of the authorities that the situation was much improved and that they could guarantee security.

It did not take long for that last claim to be exposed. Returning from the track on Wednesday evening, down the main highway into the capital Manama, four Force India mechanics were caught between protestors on one side of the road and riot police on the other.

The protestors were throwing petrol bombs at the police, who were responding with tear gas. Petrol bombs flew over the car, and one landed worryingly close.

The whole incident lasted no more than two or three minutes, but it clearly spooked those involved – and the rest of their team, who subsequently chose to skip second practice on Friday so they could return to their hotels before dark. A decision made despite an intervention by Ecclestone.

Most F1 personnel encountered no trouble. But the unrest continued throughout the weekend, and on Friday night a protestor was killed.

Vettel, who had described the controversy over the race as “hype” when he arrived on Thursday, was forced to think again. “It’s always dreadful when someone dies,” he said after qualifying on pole position.

For all the protestations from Todt and Ecclestone about sport staying apart from politics, the grand prix has become part of the argument in Bahrain.

The protests are not specifically directed at the race, but it is seen as a legitimate target because it is so closely identified with the ruling Sunni royal family, who set it up as a global promotional tool for the country and by extension their regime.

The race organisers – effectively the royal family themselves – have overtly politicised the event by promoting it with posters using the F1 logo in the middle of the slogan “UniF1ed”, in a country that is clearly anything but.

Protesters in Bahrain

Protests have targeted Formula 1 both inside Bahrain and across the world. Photo: Getty

Ecclestone’s and Todt’s responses to this – that they cannot control how people promote their races (Ecclestone) or that the slogan can be interpreted in lots of ways (Todt) – are debatable at best. Some have called it sophistry.

If F1′s bosses thought they could go to Bahrain, pick up the huge pay cheque for the race, and get out without any damage to their or the sport’s reputation, they have been disabused of that notion in the starkest terms.

On Saturday, Mercedes team boss Ross Brawn – who, behind the scenes, has been one of the senior figures most opposed to holding the Bahrain race – said F1 “with proper judgement of what happened and what we saw needed to come to a conclusion”.

I am told by senior insiders that the many of the sport’s bosses have been staggered by the extent to which the sport’s name has been dragged through the mud this weekend, as well as the focus on it by major global news organisations.

Quite apart from the obvious moral and personal safety issues involved, this is clearly a commercial concern. F1 is selling a dream and an aspiration. But the dream has this weekend become a nightmare – and there has been nothing aspirational about the image the sport has presented to the world.

F1 being what it is, if anything will make them wake up to the potential consequences of racing in Bahrain, that will be it.

Source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/andrewbenson/2012/04/the_right_race_in_the_wrong_pl.html

Stefan Bellof Paul Belmondo Tom Belso JeanPierre Beltoise Olivier Beretta Allen Berg

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off